Google flagship reasoning model
Gemini 4 Argon
Google’s flagship Gemini 4 reasoning model for long-horizon software engineering, deep scientific and mathematical work, autonomous multi-step agents, enterprise knowledge work, defensive cybersecurity, and unusually long reasoning trajectories.
- Unified context
- 1.05M
- input + thinking + output
- Standard output
- 65,536
- tokens
- Long decode
- Up to 1.05M
- shared budget
- Input
- $2.00
- intro · per 1M
- Output
- $10.00
- intro · per 1M
01 / Overview
What Gemini 4 Argon Is
Gemini 4 Argon is Google’s flagship reasoning model for the hardest long-horizon tasks across software engineering, science, mathematics, enterprise knowledge work, autonomous agents, and defensive cybersecurity.
Gemini 4 Starts With a Frontier Reasoning Model
Google announced Gemini 4 Argon on September 30, 2026 through a phased release to trusted cyber defenders.
The model became generally available through the Gemini API on October 13, 2026.
Its stable API identifier is gemini-4-argon.
Google describes Argon as its latest and most capable model.
The intended workload is not lightweight chat. Argon is designed for tasks that may require extended reasoning, many tool calls, difficult software-engineering decisions, deep mathematical work, scientific investigation, long documents, multimodal evidence, complex business processes, autonomous multi-step execution, and cybersecurity defense.
The model accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and generates text output.
Argon supports thinking, function calling, structured outputs, code execution, computer use, file search, Google Search grounding, Google Maps grounding, URL context, agentic video understanding, implicit caching, Batch API, Flex inference, and Priority inference.
It does not support native audio generation, native image generation, or the Live API.
- Provider
- Family
- Gemini 4
- Model ID
- gemini-4-argon
- Status
- Stable · GA
- GA date
- Oct 13, 2026
- Knowledge cutoff
- Mar 2026
- Input
- Text, Image, Video, Audio, PDF
- Output
- Text
02 / Long-horizon work
Gemini 4 Argon Is Built for Long-Horizon Work
The defining product idea behind Argon is sustained reasoning: one task can involve many decisions, tool calls, revisions, and evidence updates before the model reaches a useful result.
A long trajectory may require the model to read source material, create a plan, call tools, evaluate results, revise assumptions, produce intermediate work, validate the result, and continue until completion.
Google positions Argon specifically for extended workflows such as:
- multi-hour software engineering;
- deep financial research;
- legal research and drafting;
- scientific problem solving;
- cybersecurity remediation;
- large-document synthesis;
- autonomous enterprise workflows.
That changes how the model should be evaluated.
Do not score only the first response.
Track the entire trajectory:
- successful completion;
- reasoning tokens;
- tool calls;
- repeated work;
- failed branches;
- elapsed time;
- human intervention;
- final validation;
- total cost.
- 01
Understand
Build a working model of the task, source material, constraints, and success criteria.
- 02
Act
Use code execution, search, functions, computer use, or files when the task requires external evidence or action.
- 03
Revise
Use new evidence to change the plan instead of repeating an invalid approach.
- 04
Finish
Continue until the required output or action is complete and validated.
03 / 1M long decode
Up to One Million Tokens in a Single Reasoning Trajectory
Gemini 4 Argon introduces a unified 1,048,576-token budget shared across input, thinking, and output, with long decode allowing responses to extend far beyond the normal 64K generation boundary.
The Context Window Is Shared
This is a major conceptual change from earlier Gemini models.
The full budget is 1,048,576 tokens and includes:
- initial input;
- multimodal representations;
- thinking;
- generated output.
A very large input therefore leaves less room for reasoning and generation.
The standard synchronous output limit is 65,536 tokens.
For longer tasks, Argon supports long decode.
Long decode can continue generation in multiple 64K hops while keeping the work inside one interaction.
On the Interactions API, long decode uses background execution. The server generates one hop, continues from that state, adds another model-output step, and repeats until completion or the shared budget is exhausted.
This is useful for long mathematical derivations, extended scientific reasoning, large code transformations, complex research reports, and exhaustive technical analysis.
Unified context
1,048,576
Standard synchronous output
65,536
Long decode can continue generation toward the full 1,048,576-token shared context budget rather than stopping at the standard 65,536-token synchronous output cap.
04 / Software engineering
A Frontier Model for Real Software Engineering
Google positions Gemini 4 Argon around real-world software engineering rather than isolated code generation, including debugging, algorithm design, codebase migration, optimization, and long-running implementation.
Google reports using Argon internally for daily debugging, large code migrations, algorithm design, and performance optimization.
One highlighted workload involves migrating C and C++ codebases to Rust at scales ranging from tens of thousands of lines to more than 800,000 lines in the Fuchsia Zircon kernel.
Google also described an internal libgav1 project in which Argon agents replaced 32,000 lines of SIMD code after repeated profile-guided experiments and compiler-output analysis.
The model reached 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1, a benchmark focused on real-world long-horizon software engineering.
Useful evaluation tasks include:
- repository-scale refactors;
- framework migrations;
- performance optimization;
- difficult debugging;
- test repair;
- code review;
- algorithm implementation;
- long tool-driven coding loops.
- 77.9%
DeepSWE v1.1
Google reports a state-of-the-art result on long-horizon real-world software engineering.
- 01
Large migrations
Coordinate changes across large codebases while preserving behavior and constraints.
- 02
Performance engineering
Use profiling, compiler output, code execution, and repeated experiments as part of the reasoning loop.
- 03
Debugging
Follow evidence through multiple failed hypotheses rather than stopping at the first plausible patch.
05 / Enterprise work
Finance, Legal, Research, and Complex Business Workflows
Argon is explicitly designed for professional knowledge work where correctness depends on combining domain reasoning, documents, tools, multimodal evidence, and multi-step execution.
Google highlights finance, legal work, tax-related reasoning, scientific research, and enterprise process automation.
Argon leads the Vals Index in Google’s launch material, covering economically important tasks across finance, coding, legal, and tax work.
Google also cites strong results on Vals Finance Agent v2 and Harvey’s Legal Agent Benchmark.
These workloads are structurally different from generic question answering.
A financial workflow may require source review, calculations, current-data grounding, and a structured conclusion.
A legal workflow may require long-document review, issue identification, research, drafting, and revision.
Argon’s unified context and long decode are directly relevant because both input and reasoning can become large.
- 01
Financial research
Combine documents, calculations, grounded information, and multi-step analysis.
- 02
Legal analysis
Read long materials, identify issues, and produce structured research or drafting.
- 03
Scientific work
Apply deep mathematical and scientific reasoning to difficult technical investigations.
- 04
Business automation
Execute workflows that combine reasoning, tools, structured data, and actions.
06 / Cybersecurity
Defensive Cybersecurity Is a First-Class Argon Workload
Google trained Gemini 4 Argon for frontier-level defensive cybersecurity tasks such as vulnerability discovery, validation, remediation, and secure software analysis.
Google describes Argon as capable of autonomously finding, validating, and patching critical software vulnerabilities.
The company initially released the model through its Fairwind Program to trusted cyber defenders before broader availability.
Published results include 68% on CWE-bench v1, where Google reports Argon tying for first place in vulnerability remediation.
Google also reports evaluations covering large codebases, 20 programming languages, attack-surface discovery, vulnerability identification, proof-of-concept validation, and remediation.
Defensive use cases include:
- secure code review;
- vulnerability triage;
- patch generation;
- dependency investigation;
- authorized security testing;
- incident-response support.
Model capability does not remove the need for authorization, sandboxing, human review, controlled network access, audit logs, and independent validation.
- 68%
CWE-bench v1
Google reports a tied first-place result on vulnerability remediation.
- 01
Discover
Inspect authorized code and systems for security-relevant weaknesses.
- 02
Validate
Use evidence and controlled testing to confirm whether a suspected issue is real.
- 03
Remediate
Generate and validate defensive patches while preserving application behavior.
07 / Multimodal
Text, Images, Video, Audio, and PDFs
Gemini 4 Argon accepts five major input categories—text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents—while producing text output.
Multimodal evidence can stay inside one reasoning workflow.
Argon can combine written instructions, screenshots, charts, diagrams, long videos, audio, and PDF documents.
This is useful for screenshot debugging, financial chart analysis, PDF synthesis, video evidence review, multimodal research, and document-heavy enterprise workflows.
Google reports 91.7% on LVBench, a long-video understanding benchmark.
Argon also supports agentic video understanding; the official model page lists static as the default mode.
Argon does not generate images or audio.
- Supported
Text
Instructions, documents, code, conversation, and structured text.
- Supported
Images
Screenshots, charts, diagrams, interfaces, and other visual evidence.
- Supported
Video
Long-video understanding and agentic video workflows.
- Supported
Audio
Audio can be supplied as input for multimodal analysis.
- Supported
PDF
PDF documents can be analyzed directly.
- Not listed
Native media generation
The model outputs text and does not provide native image or audio generation.
08 / Agents & tools
A Broad Tool Surface for Autonomous Agents
Gemini 4 Argon supports a wide set of built-in and application-defined tools, making it suitable for agents that gather evidence, run code, interact with interfaces, and take structured actions.
Supported capabilities include:
- function calling;
- code execution;
- computer use;
- file search;
- Google Search grounding;
- Google Maps grounding;
- URL context;
- structured outputs.
Computer Use is available in Preview and can support browser, mobile, and desktop workflows through screenshots and generated UI actions.
Important workflows should remain supervised because UI automation can make mistakes.
Search grounding, file search, and URL context allow agents to bring external evidence into the same reasoning trajectory.
- 01
Gather
Use Search grounding, file search, URL context, PDFs, video, and other inputs to collect evidence.
- 02
Reason
Use low, medium, or high thinking based on task complexity.
- 03
Act
Call functions, run code, or use computer actions when external execution is required.
- 04
Validate
Inspect tool results and continue until the outcome satisfies the task.
09 / Thinking
Low, Medium, and High Thinking
Gemini 4 Argon exposes three thinking levels—low, medium, and high—with medium as the default.
Thinking lets applications trade among reasoning depth, latency, token use, and cost.
Low is useful when the task still needs reasoning but speed matters.
Medium is Google’s default and a practical baseline.
High is appropriate for difficult coding, scientific, mathematical, investigative, security, or long-horizon agentic work.
Thinking tokens consume part of the same 1,048,576-token budget as input and output.
Google recommends raising explicit output caps below 32,768 because Argon may spend more of the allowance on thinking.
Normal hard task
Start with medium and compare quality, latency, thinking tokens, tool calls, and total cost.
Deep investigation
Use high when more reasoning materially improves a difficult multi-step outcome.
10 / Benchmarks
Gemini 4 Argon Benchmark Results
Google’s launch materials emphasize long-horizon software engineering, end-to-end business automation, long-video understanding, and defensive vulnerability remediation.
Published Argon results include:
- 77.9% DeepSWE v1.1;
- 51.3% AutomationBench;
- 91.7% LVBench;
- 68% CWE-bench v1.
DeepSWE v1.1 measures long-horizon real-world software engineering.
AutomationBench measures end-to-end execution across business workflows; Google reports Argon ranking first.
LVBench measures long-video understanding; Google describes Argon’s 91.7% as state of the art.
CWE-bench v1 measures vulnerability remediation; Google reports Argon tying for first place.
Google also says Argon leads the Vals Index, which covers economically important tasks across finance, coding, legal, and tax work.
- 77.9%
DeepSWE v1.1
Long-horizon real-world software engineering.
- 51.3%
AutomationBench
End-to-end execution across business workflows.
- 91.7%
LVBench
Long-video understanding.
- 68%
CWE-bench v1
Software vulnerability remediation.
11 / Pricing
Gemini 4 Argon Pricing
Through November 30, 2026, Google lists introductory pricing of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with output pricing including thinking tokens.
Current introductory rates:
- input: $2.00 per 1M tokens;
- implicit cached input: $0.10 per 1M tokens on cache hits;
- output including thinking: $10.00 per 1M tokens.
Beginning December 1, 2026, Google lists:
- input: $4.00 per 1M tokens;
- implicit cached input: $0.20 per 1M tokens;
- output including thinking: $20.00 per 1M tokens.
The cached rate reflects a 95% discount when implicit caching hits.
Argon is not available on the Gemini API Free tier.
For Argon, cost per completed task is more informative than cost per request because reasoning and long decode can materially increase generated tokens.
1M tokens · USD
- Input
- $2.00
- Implicit cached input
- $0.10
- Output + thinking
- $10.00
Example: 100K input + 20K output/thinking
- Input cost
- $0.200
- Output cost
- $0.200
- Estimated total
- $0.400
12 / Caching
Gemini 4 Argon Removes Explicit Context Caching
Argon supports implicit caching but not explicit cache objects, making cache optimization automatic rather than something applications manually create and manage.
Google states that explicit caching is unsupported for Gemini 4 Argon and onward.
Applications should remove cachedContents, caches.create, and cached_content references.
Implicit caching is enabled automatically.
For Argon, Google lists 4,096 tokens as the minimum input size for implicit caching eligibility.
To improve cache-hit probability:
- place large stable content near the beginning of prompts;
- reuse similar prompt prefixes;
- continue conversations through server-side state where appropriate.
A successful cache hit reduces billed input pricing by 95%.
Applications can inspect cached-token usage in API usage metadata.
- 01
No cache object
Argon does not support manually managed explicit cache resources.
- 02
Stable prefixes
Repeated large prefixes improve the chance of an automatic cache hit.
- 4,096
Minimum eligible input
Google lists 4,096 input tokens as the implicit-caching threshold.
- 95%
Cache-hit discount
Successful implicit cache hits reduce the billed input-token rate by 95%.
13 / API behavior
Gemini 4 Argon Changes Several API Assumptions
Migrating to Argon involves more than replacing the model string because Gemini 4 changes output behavior, caching, sampling controls, long-running execution, and conversation state.
Google tells developers to remove:
temperature;top_p;top_k.
Those sampling parameters are ignored.
Use explicit instructions, structured outputs, and thinking_level instead.
Modern Gemini API behavior also disallows ending a request with a non-empty prefilled model turn.
The Interactions API can preserve multi-turn state through previous_interaction_id, which is useful for function-calling and long-running workflows.
Hard Argon prompts can take several minutes.
For very long generation:
- use background execution;
- set an appropriate
max_output_tokens; - increase client timeouts;
- continue or poll the interaction as required.
- 01
Use thinking_level
Choose low, medium, or high instead of using sampling parameters as the main reasoning control.
- 02
Remove explicit caching
Argon uses implicit caching and does not accept manually created cached-content resources.
- 03
Use interaction state
Continue multi-turn work with previous_interaction_id.
- 04
Plan for background execution
Use long-running execution when output must exceed the normal 64K generation boundary.
14 / Argon vs Flash
Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini Flash Models
Argon should not be treated as the automatic replacement for every Gemini Flash workload: its advantage is frontier reasoning depth, while Flash models remain better suited to latency-sensitive and high-volume execution.
Choose Argon when the workload requires:
- very deep reasoning;
- long-horizon software engineering;
- complex multi-step agents;
- large enterprise investigations;
- frontier scientific or mathematical reasoning;
- difficult cybersecurity defense;
- long multimodal synthesis;
- unusually long output.
Flash models are usually the stronger production choice when latency dominates, request volume is high, the task is bounded, cost sensitivity is high, and frontier reasoning does not materially improve success rate.
The correct comparison should track accepted-result rate, latency, thinking tokens, tool calls, retries, output length, and total cost.
- 01
Argon
Use for frontier reasoning, difficult coding, deep investigations, long trajectories, and high-value complex tasks.
- 02
Flash
Use for high-throughput, latency-sensitive, and cost-sensitive workloads that do not need maximum reasoning depth.
- 03
Route by complexity
Send normal tasks to a faster model and escalate difficult cases to Argon.
- 04
Measure completed-task economics
Compare success, latency, retries, tool use, and total token cost rather than benchmark rank alone.
15 / Evaluation
Gemini 4 Argon Strengths and Limitations
Argon is optimized for depth and persistence rather than minimum latency or minimum price, making it most valuable when the task is difficult enough to justify a frontier reasoning model.
Strengths
Long reasoning trajectories
A unified 1M-token context and long decode enable unusually deep single-task execution.
Frontier software engineering
Google reports 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1 and highlights large migrations, optimization, and debugging.
Broad multimodal input
Text, images, video, audio, and PDFs can participate in one reasoning workflow.
Agentic tool surface
Function calling, code execution, computer use, file search, grounding, URL context, and structured outputs support complex agents.
Defensive cybersecurity
Argon is trained for vulnerability discovery, validation, and remediation, with a reported 68% on CWE-bench v1.
What to consider
Frontier-tier price
Introductory pricing is above Flash-class models, and Google lists a 2× standard input/output rate beginning December 1, 2026.
Potentially high latency
Deep reasoning and long decode can take minutes, and Google’s model card notes occasional slowness or timeout issues.
Shared context budget
Input, thinking, and output all consume the same 1,048,576-token window.
No explicit caching
Argon relies on implicit caching rather than manually controlled cache objects.
No Live API
Argon is not the primary choice for realtime low-latency voice or live multimodal interaction.
Evaluate the frontier tier with your own workload
Test Gemini 4 Argon on the tasks that actually justify it
Replay difficult coding, multi-step agent, long-document, video, scientific, legal, financial, and security-defense workloads while measuring quality, thinking tokens, tool calls, latency, long-decode behavior, and total cost.
Start FreeGemini 4 Argon is a paid-tier flagship model. Introductory API pricing is scheduled through November 30, 2026; Google lists higher standard rates beginning December 1, 2026.
Common Questions
What is Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is Google’s flagship Gemini 4 reasoning model for complex software engineering, scientific and mathematical problem solving, long-horizon agents, enterprise knowledge work, and defensive cybersecurity.
What is the Gemini 4 Argon model ID?
The stable Gemini API model ID is gemini-4-argon.
When was Gemini 4 Argon released?
Google announced Gemini 4 Argon on September 30, 2026 through a phased rollout and released the stable model generally through the Gemini API on October 13, 2026.
Is Gemini 4 Argon stable?
Yes. Google lists gemini-4-argon as a stable generally available Gemini API model.
What is Gemini 4 Argon’s knowledge cutoff?
Google’s model card lists March 2026 as the Gemini 4 knowledge cutoff.
What is the context window of Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon has a unified 1,048,576-token context window shared across input, thinking, and output.
Does Argon have separate 1M input and output windows?
No. Input, thinking, and output share the same 1,048,576-token budget.
What is the normal maximum output?
Google lists 65,536 tokens as the standard synchronous maximum output.
Can Gemini 4 Argon output one million tokens?
Long decode can continue generation toward the full shared 1,048,576-token context budget, depending on input and thinking usage.
What is long decode?
Long decode continues generation past the normal 64K boundary in continuation hops while preserving one interaction and reasoning trajectory.
What thinking levels does Gemini 4 Argon support?
Gemini 4 Argon supports low, medium, and high thinking. Medium is the default.
How much does Gemini 4 Argon cost?
Through November 30, 2026, Google lists introductory pricing of $2 per 1M input tokens and $10 per 1M output tokens, including thinking tokens.
What is the standard price after November 30, 2026?
Google lists $4 per 1M input tokens and $20 per 1M output tokens beginning December 1, 2026.
How much does cached input cost?
Implicit cache hits receive a 95% discount: $0.10 per 1M cached input tokens during introductory pricing and $0.20 beginning December 1, 2026.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support explicit caching?
No. Gemini 4 Argon uses implicit caching and does not support manually managed explicit cache objects.
What is the implicit caching threshold?
Google lists 4,096 input tokens as the minimum size for implicit caching eligibility.
Is Gemini 4 Argon available on the free API tier?
No. Google states that Gemini 4 Argon is not available on the Gemini API Free tier.
What inputs does Gemini 4 Argon support?
The model supports text, images, video, audio, and PDF input.
What does Gemini 4 Argon output?
Gemini 4 Argon produces text output.
Can Gemini 4 Argon generate images?
No. The official model page lists image generation as unsupported.
Can Gemini 4 Argon generate audio?
No. Audio generation is unsupported.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support the Live API?
No. Argon is not the primary choice for low-latency realtime voice interaction.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support function calling?
Yes. Function calling is supported.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support structured outputs?
Yes. Structured outputs are supported.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support code execution?
Yes. Code execution is supported.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support computer use?
Yes. Google lists Computer Use as a Preview capability.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support Google Search grounding?
Yes. Search grounding is supported.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support Google Maps grounding?
Yes. Google Maps grounding is supported.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support file search?
Yes. File search is supported.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support URL context?
Yes. URL context is supported.
Is Gemini 4 Argon good for coding?
Yes. Google reports 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1 and positions Argon for complex real-world software engineering.
What is Gemini 4 Argon’s AutomationBench score?
Google reports 51.3% on AutomationBench.
What is Gemini 4 Argon’s LVBench score?
Google reports 91.7% on LVBench for long-video understanding.
What is Gemini 4 Argon’s CWE-bench v1 score?
Google reports 68% on CWE-bench v1, tied for first place in vulnerability remediation.
Is Gemini 4 Argon designed for cybersecurity?
Yes. Defensive cybersecurity is a first-class model focus, including vulnerability discovery, validation, and remediation.
Is Gemini 4 Argon suitable for legal and financial work?
Yes. Google explicitly positions Argon for professional knowledge work including legal and financial analysis.
Does Gemini 4 Argon support Batch API?
Yes. Gemini 4 Argon supports the Batch API for asynchronous request processing.